Everything you need to verify before launching AI to production.
You’re about to ship an AI feature. The demo works. Stakeholders are excited. The deadline is tomorrow.
What should you verify before going live?
This checklist is what we use at Rotascale and what we recommend to clients. It’s comprehensive but practical - designed for teams shipping real AI products, not academic exercises.
Print it. Share it. Use it as a gate for every AI launch.
Quick Reference
- Evaluation - Do you know if it works?
- Monitoring - Will you know when it breaks?
- Fallbacks - What happens when it fails?
- Cost Controls - Can you afford it at scale?
- Operations - Can you respond to incidents?
A feature should not launch until all five gates are cleared.
Gate 1: Evaluation
Before launch, you need evidence that the feature works. Not “it looks good in demos” - actual measured performance.
Baseline Metrics
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Success criteria defined | What does "good" mean for this feature? |
| ☐ | Test dataset created | Representative inputs with expected outputs |
| ☐ | Baseline metrics documented | Current performance before launch |
| ☐ | Acceptance thresholds set | Minimum acceptable performance levels |
Failure Mode Testing
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Edge cases tested | Unusual inputs, boundary conditions |
| ☐ | Adversarial inputs tested | Prompt injection, jailbreak attempts |
| ☐ | Empty/malformed inputs tested | Graceful handling of bad data |
| ☐ | Hallucination evaluation | Measured rate on test set |
Regression Framework
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Automated eval suite | Can run evals without manual effort |
| ☐ | CI/CD integration | Evals run on every change |
| ☐ | Regression blocking | Failed evals prevent deployment |
flowchart LR
subgraph "Evaluation Gate"
TC[Test Cases] --> AS[Automated Suite]
AS --> CI[CI/CD Pipeline]
CI --> GT{Pass?}
GT -->|Yes| NEXT[Proceed]
GT -->|No| BLOCK[Block Deploy]
end
style BLOCK fill:#fee2e2
style NEXT fill:#dcfce7
Gate 2: Monitoring
You need to know when things go wrong - before users tell you.
Performance Monitoring
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Latency tracking | p50, p95, p99 response times |
| ☐ | Error rate tracking | Failed requests, timeouts, exceptions |
| ☐ | Token usage tracking | Input/output tokens per request |
| ☐ | Throughput tracking | Requests per second/minute |
Quality Monitoring
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Output quality scoring | Automated quality assessment |
| ☐ | Hallucination detection | Flag suspicious outputs |
| ☐ | Drift detection | Alert on distribution changes |
| ☐ | User feedback capture | Thumbs up/down, explicit feedback |
Alerting
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Alert thresholds defined | When to page vs. notify |
| ☐ | On-call routing configured | Who gets alerted when |
| ☐ | Escalation paths defined | If first responder unavailable |
Gate 3: Fallbacks
AI systems fail. Your architecture needs to handle failure gracefully.
Failure Handling
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Timeout configured | Don't wait forever for responses |
| ☐ | Retry logic implemented | With exponential backoff |
| ☐ | Circuit breaker configured | Stop cascading failures |
| ☐ | Graceful degradation defined | What happens when AI is down |
Fallback Options
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Backup model configured | Alternative provider/model |
| ☐ | Cached responses available | For common requests |
| ☐ | Human escalation path | When AI can't handle request |
| ☐ | Static fallback option | Worst-case user experience |
flowchart TD
REQ[Request] --> PRIMARY[Primary Model]
PRIMARY -->|Success| RESP[Response]
PRIMARY -->|Timeout/Error| RETRY[Retry with Backoff]
RETRY -->|Success| RESP
RETRY -->|Fail| BACKUP[Backup Model]
BACKUP -->|Success| RESP
BACKUP -->|Fail| CACHE[Check Cache]
CACHE -->|Hit| RESP
CACHE -->|Miss| HUMAN[Human Escalation]
HUMAN --> RESP
style PRIMARY fill:#dcfce7
style BACKUP fill:#fef3c7
style CACHE fill:#fef3c7
style HUMAN fill:#fee2e2
Gate 4: Cost Controls
AI at scale is expensive. You need controls before you need them desperately.
Budget Management
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Cost per request estimated | Expected token usage × pricing |
| ☐ | Monthly budget defined | What's the spending cap? |
| ☐ | Cost tracking implemented | Real-time spend visibility |
| ☐ | Budget alerts configured | Alert at 50%, 75%, 90% |
Rate Limiting
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Per-user rate limits | Prevent abuse by individuals |
| ☐ | Global rate limits | Cap total system throughput |
| ☐ | Hard spending cap | Automatic shutoff at limit |
Cost Optimization
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Prompt optimization | Minimize token usage |
| ☐ | Response caching | Cache common responses |
| ☐ | Model tiering | Cheaper models for simple tasks |
Gate 5: Operations
When something goes wrong at 2am, can you respond?
Documentation
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Architecture documented | How the system works |
| ☐ | Runbooks created | Step-by-step incident response |
| ☐ | Rollback procedure documented | How to revert changes |
| ☐ | Contact list current | Who to call for what |
Incident Response
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | On-call rotation established | Someone is always responsible |
| ☐ | Severity levels defined | What's P1 vs P2 vs P3 |
| ☐ | Communication plan | How to notify stakeholders |
| ☐ | Post-mortem process | Learn from incidents |
Rollback Capability
| ✓ | Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Previous version available | Can revert to last known good |
| ☐ | Rollback tested | Actually tried the procedure |
| ☐ | Feature flag available | Can disable without deploy |
The One-Page Summary
AI Production Readiness - Quick Check
EVALUATION
☐ Test dataset exists
☐ Baseline metrics documented
☐ Automated eval suite runs in CI/CD
☐ Deployments gated on eval pass
MONITORING
☐ Latency, errors, tokens tracked
☐ Quality scoring in production
☐ Drift detection enabled
☐ Alerts configured with on-call
FALLBACKS
☐ Timeouts and retries configured
☐ Backup model available
☐ Graceful degradation defined
☐ Human escalation path exists
COST CONTROLS
☐ Budget and spending cap defined
☐ Rate limits implemented
☐ Cost tracking enabled
☐ Alerts at 50/75/90% of budget
OPERATIONS
☐ Runbooks written
☐ On-call rotation established
☐ Rollback procedure tested
☐ Post-mortem process defined
LAUNCH DECISION
☐ All five gates cleared → Ship it
☐ Any gate failed → Fix first
Don’t ship AI without this checklist. Seriously.
Need help getting production-ready? Our platform covers evaluation, monitoring, and cost controls out of the box. See how Rotascale helps.